Underground Usa

The significant difference between most Americans and the ideological far-Left is that most Americans can disagree on any given issue and not feel obligated to despise the person with whom they disagree. Many times, those who are not on the lunatic fringe can disagree and still actually like, respect, and even support one another. And so it is that I disagree with President Trump on his easing off the Iranian mullahs without achieving unconditional surrender.To be clear, I am not a supporter of gratuitous war; of optional, nation-building, regime-change conflicts that put American military personnel in harm's way for politically opportune purposes. I believe the US military has been abused and misused in contemporary times, especially at the hands of globalists and political charlatans. The US military should only be employed to confront direct threats to the United States and the vanquishment of true evil.But I argue that both cases exist in the mullahs of the Islamic Republic of Iran, a nation that, for 47

The narrative of Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) as a formidable military force has been peddled for years, amplified by propaganda and echoed by sympathetic global media. Yet, recent Israeli and US strikes have exposed this narrative as flimsy, collapsing under scrutiny. The IRGC’s decimation in these operations reveals a truth long masked by bravado: Iran’s military capabilities, like those of other overhyped regimes in the region, are far less potent than claimed.History provides clear parallels, from Iraq’s collapse in 1991 to Syria’s implosion and the Arab coalition’s humiliation in 1967. When examined, the pattern is unmistakable—boastful regimes, often backed by Russia, consistently fail to deliver on their rhetoric. The narrative of the IRGC’s military strength and the threats from Iran, Russia, China, and North Korea, often referred to as the “Axis Powers,” could very well simply be hollow posturing.The Middle East offers a graveyard of militaries whose reputations were inflated beyon

The Islamic Republic of Iran, under the despotic rule of its theocratic mullahs, stands as a malignant force against the United States, Israel, and the free world. Since the 1979 Islamic Revolution, this regime has pursued a relentless campaign of terrorism, oppression, and destabilization, cloaked in religious zeal but driven by an insatiable lust for power and control. Its actions—through proxy terrorist organizations, internal atrocities, dangerous alliances with authoritarian states, and a now-crippled nuclear ambition—mark it as a clear and present danger to global freedom.Ridding the world of this theocratic cancer is not another “forever war,” as some in a small faction of the MAGA movement suggest, but a necessary confrontation with a declared enemy, one whose extinction would unshackle tens of millions, stabilize the Middle East, and bolster global security.The mullahs’ regime has orchestrated a shadow war against the United States and its allies through a sprawling web of proxy terrorist organizatio

The MAGA majority has been a steadfast and righteous voice against the reckless proxy wars that have drained America’s strength—conflicts like those in Iraq, Libya, and, some would argue Ukraine, driven by globalist agendas with little benefit to the United States. Their rejection of gratuitous regime-change schemes and endless military entanglements reflects a deep commitment to prioritizing American interests. Yet, there is a critical distinction between avoiding optional wars and confronting existential threats posed by tyrannical regimes like Iran’s Islamofascist mullahs and Communist China. For a movement built on strength and patriotism, embracing a contemporary form of isolationism in the face of such evil is not just misguided—it’s a borderline betrayal of the values that define America’s greatness.The MAGA base’s distrust of Washington’s war machine is well-earned. Years of betrayal by elites have fueled legitimate skepticism of neo-con-induced foreign conflicts. But retreating into any form of isola

People took it as pure political rhetoric when Rev. Jeremiah Wright, Barack Obama’s declared spiritual influence, used the phrase “the chickens have come home to roost.” Little did he, Obama, or anyone else know—but for the Marxists of the far-Left in the Democrat Party, that those chickens would appear in the form of unhinged murderers targeting elected officials for assassination.The far-Left’s gratuitous hate messaging, continuous in the mainstream since Obama’s Marxist coalition erupted onto the main political stage in 2008, has fomented a reality so mired in desperation—a desperation fostered by a litany of manufactured crises and myriad campaigns or smear and hate, all in a quest for power—that the intellectually fragile and brainwashed who follow them are rationalizing murder as a tool of protest and legitimate political discourse. It’s happening increasingly and without discrimination for political ideology, from political rallies in Butler, Pennsylvania, to Florida golf courses and now, to posh neigh

Israel’s decisive pre-emptive strike against Iran’s nuclear and ballistic missile programs, as well as its military infrastructure, stands as a bold and necessary act of self-defense, not just for the Jewish state but for the stability of the Middle East and the world. The Iranian regime, led by its fanatical mullahs, has proven itself an unrelenting threat to global security, and Israel’s action underscores its unwavering commitment to neutralizing existential dangers. This strike was not an act of aggression but a calculated move to prevent a catastrophe that would have reverberated far beyond the region.Iran’s nuclear ambitions, pursued with relentless deception, pose a grave and unacceptable risk. For decades, the regime has violated international agreements, concealed enrichment facilities, and advanced its nuclear program under the guise of “peaceful” intentions. A nuclear-armed Iran would be a disaster for several reasons. First, the mullahs’ apocalyptic ideology, rooted in a warped interpretation of S

The streets of Paramount, California, just outside Los Angeles, became a battleground this weekend, not because of some organic uprising but because of a meticulously planned assault on law and order.Hundreds of protesters, many of them foreign nationals illegally on US soil, blocked roads, attacked federal officers, burned flags, and destroyed private property. This wasn’t a spontaneous outpouring of frustration—it was a calculated, funded, and coordinated act of anarchic insurrection. The culprits? A coalition of radical organizations and their shadowy financiers, who exploit illegal immigrants as pawns in their ideological war against America’s sovereignty.At the heart of this chaos lies a network of groups, exposed through the diligent research of an X user, “DataRepublican (small r),” whose findings reveal the ugly truth behind the protests. The Coalition for Humane Immigration Rights (CHIRLA), the Party for Socialism and Liberation (PSL), and the ANSWER Coalition are among the chief orchestrators. These

The rule of law is the cornerstone of a sovereign nation, and its strict enforcement is essential to maintaining order, security, and the will of the American people. Deviating from legislated statutes, except as mandated by constitutionally required due process, undermines the foundation of our Republic.The deportation case of the Soliman family, following the terrorist attack in Boulder, Colorado, on June 1, 2025, highlights the urgent need to enforce immigration laws without compromise. This case also exposes a troubling pattern of US District Court judges obstructing the Trump administration’s agenda, particularly on immigration, by extending to non-citizens constitutional protections reserved for US citizens.Compounding this issue is Congress’s failure to exercise its constitutional authority to limit the scope of these courts, despite growing public demands for reform, allowing judicial activism to flourish unchecked.Mohamed Sabry Soliman, an Egyptian national, admittedly firebombed a pro-Israel rally i

As a former professional firefighter and paramedic, I understand the seriousness and absolute need for an informed, effective, and well-coordinated emergency response, whether it’s to a local, regional, or national event. So, as the Atlantic hurricane season approaches, the matter of FEMA’s effectiveness, its role, and how the Trump administration wants to restructure this dysfunctional agency is a topic that we should bring into focus.The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) has long been touted as the cornerstone of America’s disaster response framework, yet its track record—most recently during the catastrophic flooding in western North Carolina, eastern Tennessee, and northern Georgia—reveals a bloated, inefficient bureaucracy that often hinders more than it helps. President Trump’s daring proposal to dismantle FEMA’s primacy and empower states as lead responders, with the federal government relegated to a supporting role, is not only a pragmatic response to FEMA’s repeated failures but a necessary

Comedy, once a bastion of free expression and unfiltered truth, has been hijacked by the sanctimonious grip of divisive politics, political correctness, and wokeism. What was historically an art form that united audiences through shared laughter has devolved into a platform for social engineering, where comedians and writers wield their microphones as megaphones for ideological agendas. The result is a fractured comedic landscape that caters to polarized tribes, alienates broad audiences, and sacrifices genuine humor for cheap applause.Late-night talk shows and sketch comedy shows like Saturday Night Live (SNL) exemplify this decay, peddling politically jaded material that fuels the social divide in America. These so-called comedians and writers have betrayed comedy’s essence, prioritizing activism over artistry, and underscore why true comedic genius thrives without leaning on divisive crutches.Late-night talk shows, once home to the irreverent wit of Johnny Carson and David Letterman, have become predictabl

Each year, as the final Monday in May approaches, our nation pauses to observe Memorial Day—a solemn occasion dedicated to remembering and honoring the brave men and women of the United States military who made the ultimate sacrifice in service to our country. These heroes, who laid down their lives in defense of freedom, embody the courage, selflessness, and unwavering commitment that have shaped the very foundation of our nation. To honor them is not merely a tradition but a sacred duty, a way to affirm that their sacrifices were not in vain and that their legacy endures in the hearts of a grateful nation.The origins of Memorial Day, originally known as Decoration Day, trace back to the aftermath of the Civil War, a conflict that tore the nation apart and claimed countless lives. In 1868, General John A. Logan, leader of an organization for Union veterans, called for a day of remembrance to decorate the graves of fallen soldiers with flowers, a gesture meant to symbolize love, respect, and eternal memory. O

In light of Moody’s move to downgrade our nation’s credit score—and the massive middle finger that the markets gave that move, this subject is appropriate and timely.The credit score industry, led by the unholy trinity of Equifax, Experian, and TransUnion, is a dystopian farce posing as a fair measure of financial trustworthiness. These agencies hold a stranglehold over people’s lives, dictating access to loans, housing, and even jobs, while producing scores that are arbitrary, discriminatory, and riddled with errors.Worse, the US credit score system eerily mirrors the social credit system of communist China, surveilling and punishing individuals under the guise of objectivity. As handmaidens to big banks, these bureaus perpetuate a cycle of exploitation that devastates lives and entrenches systemic inequities.Credit scores, those three-digit numbers that supposedly define your financial worth, are built on a foundation of whimsy. The proprietary algorithms behind FICO and VantageScore, used by Equifax, Exper

There is a quiet conquest taking place in the Western world, one fueled by dogmatic edict on the one hand and our culture’s neo-Marxian decay on the other. It’s particularly evident in Europe, but in many places in the United States, it is taking root. And unless we recognize what is happening, our way of life will be irreparably damaged.For over a decade, I ran a 501c3 non-profit that educated on the external threats facing our country—specifically, Islamofascism and progressivism—and our nation’s love affair with constitutional illiteracy. I spoke internationally about this “perfect storm,” warning that if left unchecked, this storm would encompass the globe. Today, we are living with the results of those warnings being ignored.Islam, historically a religion of conquest, is executing a soft jihad on the West, not through swords but through strategic territorial acquisition, higher fertility rates, and exploitation of the West’s progressive-instilled nihilistic cultural decay. This insidious approach, driven

This may sound like I am giving the opposition advice or letting them see a crafted playbook to a better place than where they are. I am not. What I am suggesting is the carving away and extermination of an ideological cancer that has allowed Marxism to infiltrate our two-party system. Without championing rehabilitative measures for a once loyal opposition, balance and compromise—checks-and-balances—are dead, and a troubled future awaits our Republic.The Democrat Party is teetering on the brink of extinction, its once-sturdy foundation crumbling under the corrosive weight of progressivism. This ideological scourge, ignited by Woodrow Wilson’s hubristic vision of societal overhaul, has split the party into two warring factions: traditional Democrats and their progressive overlords.Traditional Democrats, anchored in pragmatic liberalism, strive to serve as the loyal opposition to Republican dominance, advocating for incremental reforms that uplift without destabilizing. Progressives, however, are a wrecking bal

The American judiciary, once a bastion of restraint and fidelity to the Constitution, has descended into a cesspool of activism that threatens the very fabric of our Republic.On May 15, 2025, the Supreme Court will hear oral arguments in a case that will inevitably address this crisis: a challenge to the rampant use of nationwide injunctions by lower court judges to obstruct President Donald Trump’s agenda. These injunctions, issued with reckless abandon, are not mere legal tools but weapons of ideological warfare, wielded by unelected judges to impose their will on the entire nation.Yet, as egregious as this judicial overreach is, it is surpassed only by the inexcusable inaction of the Republican-controlled Congress, which has squandered its mandate to codify Trump’s executive orders into law and curb the courts’ excesses. This dual betrayal—by activist judges and feckless legislators—demands a reckoning.The case before the Supreme Court stems from the Trump administration’s appeal against a federal judge’s

The Catholic Church witnessed a historic moment with the election of Robert Francis Cardinal Prevost as Pope Leo XIV, marking the first time an American has ascended to the papacy. This seismic shift in Vatican leadership, following the death of Pope Francis, not only reflects the global reach of Catholicism but also signals a potential realignment in the Church’s ideological and political priorities. Pope Leo XIV’s background, his choice of papal name, and the broader implications of his elevation—particularly in relation to the United States’ political landscape under the Trump administration—offer a rich tapestry for understanding the future trajectory of the Church.Born in Dalton, Illinois—a south suburb of Chicago, Robert Prevost’s journey to the papacy traveled through Villanova University and is rooted in a deep commitment to missionary work and ecclesiastical leadership. A member of the Augustinian order, Prevost spent significant portions of his career in Peru, serving as a missionary and later as th

In contemporary America, a disturbing trend festers within the Black community: a reckless dependence on violence as the go-to method for settling disputes, paired with an arrogant sense of entitlement that shamelessly excuses such behavior. This problem is glaringly exposed by crime statistics and the flood of social media videos showcasing Black individuals, especially women, unleashing physical aggression in situations that scream for restraint or rational dialogue.The facts, when honestly examined, reveal a cultural decay that sabotages the community’s advancement, cements damaging stereotypes, and demands unflinching, brutal self-scrutiny.Crime statistics lay bare an uncomfortable truth. The FBI’s 2019 Uniform Crime Report shows Black individuals, making up 12.2% of the US population, accounted for 51.2% of murder arrests, 52.7% of robbery arrests, and 28.8% of burglary arrests.The incarceration rate for Black Americans is equally lopsided, with 600 per 100,000 Black individuals in jails compared to 184

Recently, Victor Davis Hanson used a phrase that struck a chord with me: Cultural Imperialism. Cultural imperialism occurs when one culture forces its values, beliefs, and ways of life onto others, often through pressure, manipulation, or the use of violence. It’s a controlling force that stifles freedom and demands conformity to a single worldview. Presented as moral progress, it silences dissent and enforces rigid ideology, often driven by uncompromising movements, particularly those of the globalist far-Left. This phenomenon manifests from authoritarian regimes to democratic societies. Therefore, it is important to understand why cultural imperialism is a dangerous threat if left unchecked.In China, the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) practices cultural imperialism through its Sinicization policies. These policies force ethnic minorities like Uyghurs and Tibetans to abandon their languages, religions, and traditions to adopt Han Chinese culture. Uyghur Muslims are detained in re-education camps, enduring for

The United States, once a beacon of medical innovation, now languishes under the suffocating grip of an utterly dysfunctional drug trial process, crippled by the Food & Drug Administration’s (FDA) labyrinthine regulations and Big Pharma’s insatiable greed. While the world advances, offering hope to millions suffering from debilitating diseases, the US medical establishment remains mired in bureaucratic quicksand, denying patients access to transformative treatments like adult stem cell-derived exosome therapies. This is not just incompetence—it’s a moral failing, a betrayal of the sick and vulnerable who are left to deteriorate while the FDA dithers and Big Pharma counts its profits.Consider the groundbreaking work of Dr. Chadwick C. Prodromos, MD, whose research at the Prodromos Stem Cell Institute has demonstrated astonishing results. Small-group studies, conducted with rigorous oversight, show an 80% success rate in treating Parkinson’s Disease, Autism, ALS, Lewy Body Dementia, Alzheimer’s Disease, and

Klaus Schwab, the self-anointed potentate architect of globalism, has finally been toppled from his perch at the World Economic Forum (WEF), resigning in disgrace on Easter Sunday 2025. The 87-year-old’s abrupt exit, cloaked in a flimsy excuse about his age, was no voluntary retirement—it was a forced retreat driven by a damning whistleblower report exposing alleged corruption and the gross hypocrisy at the heart of the WEF’s elitist empire. This isn’t just the end of Schwab’s reign; it’s a crack in the facade of the globalist agenda that’s been fleecing nations and subjugating freedoms for decades.The whistleblower report reads like a sordid tale of entitlement. Schwab, the man who preached “stakeholder capitalism” to the masses, is charged with treating the WEF’s coffers as his personal piggy bank, instructing subordinates to pull thousands from ATMs for his whims and billing the Forum for private, in-room massages at luxury hotels. His wife, Hilde, a former WEF employee, reportedly joined in the embezzleme